top of page

Understanding Email Headers in Digital Forensics


Emails are an integral part of modern communication, serving as both a personal and professional lifeline. Behind the scenes of every email is a digital envelope known as the email header, a treasure trove of metadata that offers invaluable insights into the email's journey, authenticity, and origin.


Email Transmission Path

An email's journey is a multi-step process:

  1. Mail Client: Emails originate from a mail client, which can be a local application like Outlook or a web-based platform such as Yahoo! Mail.

  2. Mail Transfer Agent (MTA): The client communicates with an MTA, a server running the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), responsible for email transmission.

  3. Route: The MTA identifies the recipient's server and forwards the email. In larger networks, emails may traverse multiple MTAs.

Key Metadata in Email Headers

While the body of an email contains the message, headers contain the metadata that digital investigators seek. Here are some crucial header fields and their implications:

  • Message-ID: Acts as a unique tracking number for the email, aiding in tracking its journey.

  • Received: Chronicles the email's path with server IP addresses, timestamps, and time zones. It's crucial to validate these entries for authenticity. (Always analyze from Bottom to Up)

  • X-Originating-IP: Previously used to reveal the sender's IP address, this field has been removed from Gmail and Outlook headers due to privacy concerns.

  • X-Mailer: Once indicating the email client used, this field is now missing in modern Gmail and Outlook headers.

X-headers: - X-Headers are experimental or extensions to normal RFC headers. Mail   providers can create X-Headers for internal tracking or administrative purposes.


Implications for Forensic Analysis

1. X-Originating-IP:

Challenges: Due to the removal of this field, tracing the actual originating IP of an email sender from Gmail or Outlook headers has become more challenging.

Alternative: Investigators might have to rely on "Received" headers, but these are often internal server IPs and may not provide the actual sender's IP.

2. X-Mailer:

• Challenges: Lack of "X-Mailer" makes it harder to determine if an email was composed locally or via a web-based client.

• Alternative: Other metadata and content analysis can sometimes provide clues about the client used to compose the email, but it's less direct than having an "X-Mailer" field.


Forensic Considerations

Challenges and Alternatives

  • Spoofing: While rare, spoofing can lead to misleading header information, requiring investigators to be vigilant.

  • Privacy: Due to global regulations like GDPR, headers have been anonymized to protect user data, complicating investigations.

  • Forensic Tools: Specialized tools can parse headers, extract metadata, and trace an email's path, aiding in investigations.


Encryption and Security Headers

Modern email services prioritize user security:

  • TLS/SSL: Both Gmail and Outlook use Transport Layer Security (TLS) for email encryption, indicated in headers.

  • SPF/DKIM/DMARC: Authentication methods to verify sender identity, also present in headers.


Server-Side Changes

Both Gmail and Outlook have undergone significant changes:

  • Google Workspace: Google's transition to Workspace brought changes in server infrastructure and email processing.

  • Cloud Integration: Microsoft's integration of Outlook with cloud services affects email storage, routing, and access.


User-Agent Headers

Modern browsers and mobile apps have influenced User-Agent headers:

  • Modern Browsers: Email headers now reflect modern browser usage, providing less specific client device information.


Key Elements to Analyse

  1. Received Headers: Start from the bottom and work your way up. These headers detail the servers the email passed through.

  2. SPF Records: Check for valid SPF records. Apple, for example, publishes SPF records.

  3. DKIM: Look for DKIM signatures to verify message integrity.

  4. Return Path: Verify that the return path is from a legitimate source, not a suspicious domain.

  5. Message ID: Compare with known legitimate messages to check for consistency.

Construction of Message ID: Typically combines the current date/time with unique system identifiers like a process ID or domain name.

Detection: Checking the message ID format can help detect forged emails.


Conclusion

Email headers, though often overlooked, are a goldmine for digital forensic investigators. By meticulously analyzing these headers, professionals can trace an email's journey, verify its authenticity, and gather valuable metadata for investigations. Despite challenges like spoofing, privacy concerns, and evolving server-side changes, a thorough approach and specialized forensic tools can navigate these obstacles.

Akash Patel

59 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page